If one believes in a rules based order then quite clearly the attack on Iran was illegal just like Russia's invasion of Ukraine! It is might is right rather than international law.
Can you believe both Israel and the USA attacked Iran and then said do not retaliate. NO evidence was provided for their assertions which was contrary to IEA's statements. By the way when was the last time the IEA examined Israel's nuclear industry? It never has!
Why is Iran an existential threat to Israel if they were able to weaponise ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads like North Korea has. Here is a thought on regime change in Iran. The USA and Israel should threaten Iran that should they launch a nuclear missile at Israel then maybe a 100 will be headed to Iran. It is a win-win. If they threaten then people would revolt as they do not want to die. Any nuclear weapon would only be used for defensive reasons.
I cannot help but wonder what would have happened if Obama's original agreement was allowed to go forward instead of being BROKEN by trump. Iran voted for reformists in a landslide as they wanted butter not guns. Iran then went to hardliners and back to guns not butter.
In the end it is entirely hypocritical for either Israel or the USA to say Iran cannot have nuclear weapons.
Whoa I just heard someone saying if Iran attacked the USA then the NATO provisions could be invoked. What. the USA attacked Iran. If you attack another nation you cannot invoke the NATO provisions.
If anyone thinks the people in Iran will rise up and get regime change when Israel or the USA say it should be so then they are dreaming!
No comments:
Post a Comment