Thursday 21 February 2013

Around the Traps 22/2/13

Okay it is Friday and it is time to see what people have been writing about in the blogosphere.

Aussie Aussie Aussie Oy oy Oy!

General
Minimum wages in the US
Wonkish
Vox Wonk ( Love that!) Bookmark the site.
Statistics well mainly Andrew Gelman

34 comments:

  1. Hey Homer, you never explained to the "cattalxy crew" why you seriously thought Skan Ki Ho was a "Chinese warlord's mistress", rather than Mark Latham calling Janet Albrechtsen a "dirty street hooker".

    Seems like you learned your history through the 'Speed Learning' brainwashing the ALP stole from the plot of The Prisoner.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Homer, Was it his wife or mistress. I forget.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I did a number of times but unfortunately they were too think to understand

    ReplyDelete
  4. "I did a number of times but unfortunately they were too think to understand"

    THEY WERE TOO THINK TO UNDERSTAND

    Of course.

    ReplyDelete
  5. too thick.

    *People who didn't know how to use the internet to get definitions used in history.
    *Jason Soon put his foot in his mouth one time by producing a comment I made at the time.

    *I said there were 5 definitions in the Urban dictionary.

    *I also said Latham had no idea of what the term meant. This was confirmed in his diaries as well but of course no-one but no-one would take this as evidence!

    ReplyDelete
  6. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=skanky%20ho

    There are but 3 definitions in the urban dictionary, none of which pertain to a Chinese warlord's mistress.

    Recant.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mark, you really should get some-one to tell about the internet.

    There were 5 definitions when I made the comment hence no-one ever questioned that at the time.

    Urban dictionary is not like an ordinary dictionary.
    It merely gives you the current definition.

    you have provided perfect proof of the Catallaxy mind!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Err, Hmoer, urban ditinary has as many defenitions as possible so the ycan generate revenue on there merchandice. somone with a MBA should know that! shouldn't they?

    ReplyDelete
  9. It has as many definitions as they need but it is up to date unlike a normal dictionary

    ReplyDelete
  10. You blundering idiot Homer. You're still not defending that horrendous crap you tried to pull.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The Internet is great at exposing ignorance.

    We now have here listed ignorance of how urban dictionary operates.

    How any sane person would expect a definition in early 2000s to be still on there now exposes this.
    However I have repeatedly told said people how Urban dictionary works so one has to ask why the continued ignorance.

    Probably aspergers.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Right...and you're probably full of crap, Homer.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "How any sane person would expect a definition in early 2000s to be still on there now exposes this.
    However I have repeatedly told said people how Urban dictionary works so one has to ask why the continued ignorance."

    So why did the definition of an allegedly historical figure change in the last nine years?

    Please retire, Homer. Think of the children.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Mark,

    Are you that think you do not understand how Urban dictionary gets their definitions and why they constantly change?

    ReplyDelete
  15. They don't change Homer. They are compiled. You are still lying and you still defend Mark Latham over a comment he regrets and he has moved far to the right of you.

    You are lying. Admit to your dishonesty and stupidity if you have any sense of shame.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yes it changes all the time.


    You have aspergers

    ReplyDelete
  17. Explain how it changes Homer.

    I put it to you they compile as many definitions as possible.

    Please tell us the alternative, how you think it works.

    Maybe you should email the editors to prove that urban dictionary really did define "Skan Kee Ho" as a "Chinese warlord's mistress".

    Then you could clear your name from this disgrace.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Mark, I have already told you this

    ReplyDelete
  19. Produce some evidence of a deletion log. GO!!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Homer Fan Club4 March 2013 at 21:37

    Stop picking on Homer.

    ReplyDelete
  21. It changes constantly like wikipedia.

    you really are slow on the uptake.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Produce some evidence of the deletion log where Skanky Ho had the "Chinese warlord's mistress" definition deleted.

    GO!!!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Go away Mark, you are embarassing yourself.

    if you wish to make comments at least make an attempt to understand the topic.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Produce some evidence.

    GO!!!

    ReplyDelete
  25. go away you have been told what happens.

    ReplyDelete
  26. You have explained the general process, even though deletions are very rare.

    You still have not cleared your name of any wrong doing.

    The deletion log should exist. Please produce evidence of it.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Mark,
    You are a fool.
    Jason Soon produced comments by me in ,I think, 2001, where I said there were 5 definitions. please note no-one produced evidence to contradict me then because there wasn't any.
    The onus isn't on me it is on you.

    It isn't hard to go back into history and find out what was on a website on a certain day of any year.

    ReplyDelete
  28. "Jason Soon produced comments by me in ,I think, 2001, where I said there were 5 definitions. please note no-one produced evidence to contradict me then because there wasn't any."

    You cannot even get the date right so why should we believe you?

    "It isn't hard to go back into history and find out what was on a website on a certain day of any year."

    True.

    http://web.archive.org/web/20110814033340/http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=skanky%20ho

    No evidence can be found of "five definitions of Skanky Ho with one as a Chinese warlord's mistress"

    You are lying.

    You silly old fool.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Mark ,you are only showing you do not understand the internet.

    Another subject to add to all the others

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You made an assertion.

      You could not back it up with any evidence.

      I searched the relevant webpage.

      There was no corresponding evidence to support your position.

      Now please explain why you are not lying, or why the evidence cannot be produced.

      Delete
  30. Homer's fan Club5 March 2013 at 19:31

    Leave Homer alone!

    ReplyDelete
  31. you haven't Mark you are not capable of it indeed you have no idea how Urban Dictionary operates.

    you are an embarrassment

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just answer the questions Homer and explain why you cannot produce the evidence.

      Admit you were lying and shilling for Latham whom you were in love with.

      Delete
  32. The only person lying around here is you.

    I have firm evidence on my side but you ,as usual, have nothing.

    ReplyDelete