Michael Blythe the Chief Economist at CBA Economic research has this hypothesis for the future for Australia.
Current
account surplus – or banana republic no more?
Current
account deficits are the norm in Australia. Deficits have been recorded in 128
of the past 150 or so years. The relatively rare surplus is typically
associated with extreme economic events. Wars and recessions seem quite
effective in producing surpluses! The historical experience has conditioned
expectations and large current account deficits are expected to persist. But we
see a significant probability that surpluses emerge over the medium term.
Current
account deficits, like budget deficits, are widely seen as a problem. They need
to be funded and they lead to an accumulation of debt over time. We need to tap
into the savings of the rest of the world, leaving us exposed to the whims of
global financial markets. From this financing perspective, the current account
deficit reflects a shortfall of domestic savings relative to domestic
investment. The gap reflects high investment rather than low savings. By
running current account deficits we have been able to sustain a higher
investment rate than otherwise. Economic growth rates and living standards are
higher than otherwise as a result.
Looking
ahead, the flow‑of‑funds will evolve in a way that could produce a current
account surplus (or net lending to the rest of the world). Households will
remain significant net lenders. The change in household behaviour was underway
before the financial crisis hit. The pickup in household savings and reduction
in borrowing appetite looks permanent. Business net borrowing is set to
decline. The mining construction boom that drove business funding requirements
to exceptionally high levels is ending. Government net borrowing should
decline. The recent mid‑year review shows the Commonwealth budget deficit
slowly declining. We suspect, however, that the government will proceed further
and faster than the baseline projections suggest.
These
shifts will narrow the gap between domestic savings and investment and reduce
net borrowing from the rest of the world. We may be generating small current
account surpluses within five years.
From
a real world perspective, the move to current account surplus requires a shift
to trade surpluses and a narrowing in the net income deficit. A sharp rise in
resource export volumes and a marked reduction in resource‑related capital goods
imports as the mining construction boom winds down will drive the move into
trade surplus. The expanding middle income population in Asia should lift
demand for Australian services exports as well. On the income side, the broad
macro backdrop suggests foreign liabilities should grow reasonably slowly. But
the expansion of Australian superannuation funds will boost foreign assets by
more. The net income deficit should narrow as a result.
Countries
that run current account surpluses typically have strong currencies. Examples
include Switzerland, Japan and Singapore. The argument is reinforced from the
deficit perspective. The fears about global capital flows generated by the Fed
tapering debate in 2013 had a bigger negative impact on those emerging economy
currencies with large current account deficits. As a result, we would expect
the AUD to strengthen should a persistent current account surplus emerge.
Abstracting from USD‑specific influences, the combination of a AAA rating and a
current account surplus would likely see the AUD again trade well above parity
to the USD.
Another
feature of current‑account‑surplus countries is that average interest rates are
lower than otherwise. There are two reasons. By definition, surplus economies
have national savings running ahead of national investment. They do not need
higher interest rates to attract capital. And the lack of reliance on global
funding sources means surplus economies are often seen as safe havens and have
lower risk premiums.'
very very interesting.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment